Sorren
Client MeetingReportBenchmark This Business
SOR-100027 · Business Intelligence Profile

Grants Pass Equipment Company

Grants Pass, OR · NAICS 423830 Industrial Machinery and Equipment Wholesalers

Revenue
$18.04M
Employees
27
Entity type
Sole Proprietorship
Years in business
37
Sorren office
Medford, OR
Advisor
Michael Barlow
EIN
**-***7671
High confidence · 90% coverage|Tax ReturnP&LBalance SheetPayrollEmployee DataIndustry Classification· 5 prior years
Compared against150 businessesNAICS 423830 — Industrial Machinery and Equipment WholesalersORRevenue $9.0M–$28.9M13–38 employees

Outlier flags

9 for review

Debt / EBITDA

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
3978592.00
Peer median
36.78
Peer 25th–75th
2.86 – 3549728.00
Off median
+10817590%

Debt / EBITDA sits above the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Payroll / Employee

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
$97K
Peer median
$68K
Peer 25th–75th
$57K – $81K
Off median
+43%

Payroll / Employee sits above the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Occupancy % Revenue

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
2.9%
Peer median
2.4%
Peer 25th–75th
2.2% – 2.7%
Off median
+20%

Occupancy cost is above peers relative to revenue; lease terms and space utilization are worth reviewing.

Benefits % Payroll

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
12.4%
Peer median
15.0%
Peer 25th–75th
13.3% – 16.7%
Off median
-18%

Benefit load runs below peers, which can affect retention in this labor market.

Retirement Contributions % Payroll

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
3.4%
Peer median
4.1%
Peer 25th–75th
3.6% – 4.6%
Off median
-18%

Retirement contributions run below peers — plan design and contribution levels are worth a professional review.

Asset Turnover

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
1.38
Peer median
1.57
Peer 25th–75th
1.49 – 1.67
Off median
-12%

Asset Turnover sits below the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Flags are internal professional-review signals based on medians and quartiles, not automated recommendations or tax advice. Differences from the peer median are Benchmark Variance.

Performance against peer benchmark

Tax year 2026
Revenue Growth
177.7%above median
Company
9.7%
Peer median
3.5%
Top quartile
6.5%
Gross Margin
0.2%below median
Company
27.9%
Peer median
27.9%
Top quartile
36.4%
EBITDA Margin
289.8%below median
Company
-1.4%
Peer median
0.7%
Top quartile
10.2%
Net Margin
76.3%below median
Company
-4.6%
Peer median
-2.6%
Top quartile
5.4%
Revenue / Employee
22.2%above median
Company
$668K
Peer median
$547K
Top quartile
$634K
Payroll % Revenue
10.1%above median
Company
16.3%
Peer median
14.8%
Top quartile
12.7%
Current Ratio
6.7%below median
Company
2.84
Peer median
3.04
Top quartile
3.33
Effective Tax Rate
at median
Company
0.0%
Peer median
0.0%
Top quartile
0.0%

Benchmark scorecard

Growth
96th
Profitability
45th
Labor Efficiency
34th
Operating Efficiency
37th
Liquidity
55th
Leverage
58th
Tax Efficiency
65th
Asset Efficiency
52nd

Financial opportunity map

$1.24M
Working Capital$532K
Operating Expenses$426K
Labor$269K
Gross Margin$12K
Capital Structure$0

Benchmark variance only — the mathematical difference between current performance and the selected peer median. Not a projection of guaranteed savings.