Sorren
Reports

Benchmark Report

Sorren-branded, client-ready reporting generated from the selected peer cohort.

Prebuilt reports
Sorren Benchmark Report

Grants Pass Industries

Grants Pass, OR · NAICS 332710 Machine Shops

Tax year 2026
Prepared by Grace Byrne
Medford, OR office
Section 1

Executive Summary

Grants Pass Industries generated $1,242,000 of revenue in 2026 with 5 employees, producing an EBITDA margin of -2.6% against a peer median of 0.5%. Compared with 29 similar businesses, performance is strongest in tax efficiency and warrants examination in labor efficiency. Total benchmark variance across all categories is $142K.

Section 2

Company Snapshot

Revenue
$1.24M
Employees
5
Entity type
Partnership
Years in business
32
Gross margin
38.7%
EBITDA margin
-2.6%
Net margin
-10.2%
Effective tax rate
0.0%
Section 3

Peer Group Definition

29 businessesNAICS 332710 — Machine ShopsORRevenue $0.6M–$2.0M2–7 employeesTax year 2026

Comparison sample size 29; NAICS 332710; revenue range $600K$2.00M; geographic filter OR. Data availability for this client: 84% coverage across tax return, financial statements, payroll and employee records.

Section 4

Financial Performance

Line item (% revenue)CompanyPeer medianTop 25%
Revenue100.0%100.0%100.0%
Cost of Goods Sold61.3%62.9%56.9%
Gross Profit38.7%37.1%43.1%
Payroll21.5%19.3%17.1%
Benefits4.9%4.3%3.8%
Occupancy3.5%3.1%2.7%
Marketing0.9%0.8%0.9%
Insurance1.3%1.6%1.4%
Professional Fees0.9%0.8%0.7%
Administrative & Other4.7%4.8%4.2%
EBITDA-2.6%0.5%7.8%
Depreciation5.6%4.5%4.2%
Interest1.9%1.9%1.7%
Net Income-10.2%-6.2%1.5%
Section 5

Profitability and Operational Efficiency

Growth
76th
Profitability
45th
Labor Efficiency
39th
Operating Efficiency
44th
Liquidity
42nd
Leverage
50th
Tax Efficiency
77th
Asset Efficiency
61st
Section 6

Balance Sheet

Current Ratio
2.92
median 3.34
Quick Ratio
2.15
median 2.16
Debt / EBITDA
326140.00
median 44.84
Debt / Equity
0.37
median 0.48
Days Sales Outstanding
55.37
median 45.36
Asset Turnover
0.93
median 1.10
Section 7

Tax Overview

Federal tax
$0
State tax
$0
Effective rate
0.0%
Section 179
$47,140
Owner compensation
$63,743
Owner distributions
$0
Retirement
$11,823
Capital expenditures
$132,302
Section 8

Industry Trends

YearRevenueGrowthGrossEBITDAPayroll %
2022$1.04M+7.4%36.0%-4.2%25.2%
2023$1.13M+8.3%35.8%-4.3%25.1%
2024$1.22M+8.2%36.6%-3.8%25.4%
2025$1.15M-5.5%38.6%-2.7%26.3%
2026$1.24M+7.6%38.7%-2.6%26.3%
Section 9

Opportunities for Discussion

  • Working Capital Position. Current ratio of 2.92 compares with an industry median of 3.34. How much liquidity headroom does the business need through its cycle?Benchmark variance $57K
  • Operating Expense Load. Operating expenses run 41.4% of revenue versus a peer median of 37.5%. Which expense categories account for the difference?Benchmark variance $48K
  • Payroll Efficiency. Total labor cost represents 26.3% of revenue against a peer median of 23.3%. Is the staffing model carrying capacity for growth, or absorbing margin?Benchmark variance $37K
  • Leverage Profile. Debt to EBITDA of 326140.00x compares with a peer median of 44.84x. Does the capital structure match the asset base and cash cycle?
  • Gross Margin Variance. Gross margin of 38.7% compares with a peer median of 37.1%. Where are direct costs and pricing diverging from comparable businesses?
  • Owner Compensation Structure. Owner compensation represents 5.1% of revenue compared with a 4.6% median for comparable entities. Should compensation strategy be reviewed with the tax team?
  • Revenue per Employee. Revenue per employee of $248K compares with a peer median of $193K. Is productivity constrained by capacity, mix, or pricing?
Section 10

Advisor Notes

Section 11

Methodology

Sorren Benchmark aggregates anonymized financial, tax, payroll and operational data across 60,000 businesses. Peer statistics report count, mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles and standard deviation. Comparisons use normalized ratios rather than raw dollars. Statistics are released only where a cohort contains at least 10 businesses, and individual peer companies are never displayed. Benchmark variance expresses the mathematical difference between this company and its peer median; it is not a projection of savings, nor tax or investment advice.