Sorren
Reports

Benchmark Report

Sorren-branded, client-ready reporting generated from the selected peer cohort.

Prebuilt reports
Sorren Benchmark Report

Ashland Home Care

Ashland, OR · NAICS 621610 Home Health Care Services

Tax year 2026
Prepared by Sofia Vaughn
Medford, OR office
Section 1

Executive Summary

Ashland Home Care generated $2,243,000 of revenue in 2026 with 41 employees, producing an EBITDA margin of 16.8% against a peer median of 7.7%. Compared with 187 similar businesses, performance is strongest in leverage and warrants examination in growth. Total benchmark variance across all categories is $822K.

Section 2

Company Snapshot

Revenue
$2.24M
Employees
41
Entity type
Sole Proprietorship
Years in business
7
Gross margin
85.2%
EBITDA margin
16.8%
Net margin
11.9%
Effective tax rate
19.1%
Section 3

Peer Group Definition

187 businessesNAICS 621610 — Home Health Care ServicesORRevenue $1.1M–$3.6M20–58 employeesTax year 2026

Comparison sample size 187; NAICS 621610; revenue range $1.10M$3.60M; geographic filter OR. Data availability for this client: 64% coverage across tax return, financial statements, payroll and employee records.

Section 4

Financial Performance

Line item (% revenue)CompanyPeer medianTop 25%
Revenue100.0%100.0%100.0%
Cost of Goods Sold14.8%12.4%11.0%
Gross Profit85.2%87.6%89.0%
Payroll47.2%56.3%49.5%
Benefits6.0%7.1%6.3%
Occupancy2.1%2.4%2.1%
Marketing2.2%2.2%2.4%
Insurance1.5%1.9%1.6%
Professional Fees1.5%1.4%1.3%
Administrative & Other4.3%4.7%4.3%
EBITDA16.8%7.7%15.7%
Depreciation1.2%1.1%1.0%
Interest0.9%0.9%0.8%
Net Income11.9%4.6%11.0%
Section 5

Profitability and Operational Efficiency

Growth
28th
Profitability
56th
Labor Efficiency
62nd
Operating Efficiency
57th
Liquidity
35th
Leverage
70th
Tax Efficiency
36th
Asset Efficiency
61st
Section 6

Balance Sheet

Current Ratio
4.86
median 5.26
Quick Ratio
4.80
median 5.19
Debt / EBITDA
0.74
median 1.63
Debt / Equity
0.62
median 0.68
Days Sales Outstanding
48.08
median 47.16
Asset Turnover
2.73
median 2.80
Section 7

Tax Overview

Federal tax
$49,104
State tax
$13,850
Effective rate
19.1%
Section 179
$17,653
Owner compensation
$80,547
Owner distributions
$144,967
Retirement
$42,533
Capital expenditures
$48,386
Section 8

Industry Trends

YearRevenueGrowthGrossEBITDAPayroll %
2022$1.60M+21.3%84.4%18.8%50.5%
2023$1.64M+2.6%84.4%18.7%50.6%
2024$1.88M+14.8%84.5%18.6%50.8%
2025$2.11M+12.3%85.0%17.3%52.5%
2026$2.24M+6.2%85.2%16.8%53.2%
Section 9

Opportunities for Discussion

  • Revenue per Employee. Revenue per employee of $55K compares with a peer median of $72K. Is productivity constrained by capacity, mix, or pricing?Benchmark variance $712K
  • Gross Margin Variance. Gross margin of 85.2% compares with a peer median of 87.6%. Where are direct costs and pricing diverging from comparable businesses?Benchmark variance $55K
  • Working Capital Position. Current ratio of 4.86 compares with an industry median of 5.26. How much liquidity headroom does the business need through its cycle?Benchmark variance $39K
  • Owner Compensation Structure. Owner compensation represents 3.6% of revenue compared with a 4.3% median for comparable entities. Should compensation strategy be reviewed with the tax team?Benchmark variance $16K
  • Payroll Efficiency. Total labor cost represents 53.2% of revenue against a peer median of 63.7%. Is the staffing model carrying capacity for growth, or absorbing margin?
  • Operating Expense Load. Operating expenses run 68.4% of revenue versus a peer median of 79.3%. Which expense categories account for the difference?
  • Leverage Profile. Debt to EBITDA of 0.74x compares with a peer median of 1.63x. Does the capital structure match the asset base and cash cycle?
Section 10

Advisor Notes

Section 11

Methodology

Sorren Benchmark aggregates anonymized financial, tax, payroll and operational data across 60,000 businesses. Peer statistics report count, mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles and standard deviation. Comparisons use normalized ratios rather than raw dollars. Statistics are released only where a cohort contains at least 10 businesses, and individual peer companies are never displayed. Benchmark variance expresses the mathematical difference between this company and its peer median; it is not a projection of savings, nor tax or investment advice.