Sorren
Client MeetingReportBenchmark This Business
SOR-100039 · Business Intelligence Profile

Highland Builders

Ashland, OR · NAICS 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Revenue
$23.35M
Employees
49
Entity type
Sole Proprietorship
Years in business
42
Sorren office
Medford, OR
Advisor
Robert Sorensen
EIN
**-***8987
Moderate confidence · 78% coverage|Tax ReturnP&LBalance SheetPayrollEmployee DataIndustry Classification· 3 prior years
Compared against170 businessesNAICS 236220 — Commercial and Institutional Building ConstructionORRevenue $11.7M–$37.4M24–69 employees

Outlier flags

5 for review

Debt / EBITDA

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
6209009.00
Peer median
296.03
Peer 25th–75th
2.98 – 3962860.50
Off median
+2097307%

Debt / EBITDA sits above the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Profit / Employee

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
$-52K
Peer median
$-15K
Peer 25th–75th
$-52K – $15K
Off median
-250%

Profit / Employee sits below the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Revenue Growth

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
0.9%
Peer median
8.2%
Peer 25th–75th
2.9% – 13.0%
Off median
-89%

Revenue Growth sits below the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Retirement Contributions % Payroll

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
3.3%
Peer median
4.2%
Peer 25th–75th
3.8% – 4.7%
Off median
-22%

Retirement contributions run below peers — plan design and contribution levels are worth a professional review.

Benefits % Payroll

ReviewBottom 25%
Client
16.8%
Peer median
21.6%
Peer 25th–75th
19.3% – 23.9%
Off median
-22%

Benefit load runs below peers, which can affect retention in this labor market.

Working Capital

StrengthTop 25%
Client
$3.88M
Peer median
$2.67M
Peer 25th–75th
$2.16M – $3.55M
Off median
+45%

Working Capital sits above the peer median and is worth a professional review before the client conversation.

Flags are internal professional-review signals based on medians and quartiles, not automated recommendations or tax advice. Differences from the peer median are Benchmark Variance.

Performance against peer benchmark

Tax year 2026
Revenue Growth
89.5%below median
Company
0.9%
Peer median
8.2%
Top quartile
13.0%
Gross Margin
23.2%below median
Company
19.4%
Peer median
25.3%
Top quartile
33.6%
EBITDA Margin
6672.9%below median
Company
-7.3%
Peer median
0.1%
Top quartile
7.6%
Net Margin
245.5%below median
Company
-10.9%
Peer median
-3.2%
Top quartile
3.5%
Revenue / Employee
2.7%above median
Company
$477K
Peer median
$464K
Top quartile
$528K
Payroll % Revenue
3.7%above median
Company
14.5%
Peer median
14.0%
Top quartile
12.2%
Current Ratio
9.1%above median
Company
2.49
Peer median
2.28
Top quartile
2.56
Effective Tax Rate
at median
Company
0.0%
Peer median
0.0%
Top quartile
0.0%

Benchmark scorecard

Growth
11th
Profitability
28th
Labor Efficiency
30th
Operating Efficiency
44th
Liquidity
66th
Leverage
17th
Tax Efficiency
59th
Asset Efficiency
42nd

Financial opportunity map

$1.69M
Gross Margin$1.37M
Operating Expenses$197K
Labor$120K
Capital Structure$0
Revenue$0

Benchmark variance only — the mathematical difference between current performance and the selected peer median. Not a projection of guaranteed savings.