Sorren
Reports

Benchmark Report

Sorren-branded, client-ready reporting generated from the selected peer cohort.

Prebuilt reports
Sorren Benchmark Report

Northwest Plumbing & Heating

Medford, OR · NAICS 238220 Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors

Tax year 2026
Prepared by Sofia Vaughn
Medford, OR office
Section 1

Executive Summary

Northwest Plumbing & Heating generated $5,115,000 of revenue in 2026 with 22 employees, producing an EBITDA margin of -2.9% against a peer median of 2.8%. Compared with 146 similar businesses, performance is strongest in growth and warrants examination in leverage. Total benchmark variance across all categories is $844K.

Section 2

Company Snapshot

Revenue
$5.12M
Employees
22
Entity type
C Corporation
Years in business
8
Gross margin
47.0%
EBITDA margin
-2.9%
Net margin
-6.7%
Effective tax rate
0.0%
Section 3

Peer Group Definition

146 businessesNAICS 238220 — Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning ContractorsORRevenue $2.6M–$8.2M11–31 employeesTax year 2026

Comparison sample size 146; NAICS 238220; revenue range $2.60M$8.20M; geographic filter OR. Data availability for this client: 64% coverage across tax return, financial statements, payroll and employee records.

Section 4

Financial Performance

Line item (% revenue)CompanyPeer medianTop 25%
Revenue100.0%100.0%100.0%
Cost of Goods Sold53.0%53.4%47.3%
Gross Profit47.0%46.6%52.7%
Payroll27.3%22.6%19.3%
Benefits5.0%4.1%3.6%
Occupancy2.2%2.1%1.9%
Marketing3.4%2.8%3.2%
Insurance2.5%2.2%2.0%
Professional Fees1.1%0.9%0.8%
Administrative & Other3.9%4.9%4.3%
EBITDA-2.9%2.8%9.4%
Depreciation2.2%2.3%2.0%
Interest1.6%1.5%1.3%
Net Income-6.7%-0.8%4.4%
Section 5

Profitability and Operational Efficiency

Growth
92nd
Profitability
35th
Labor Efficiency
27th
Operating Efficiency
46th
Liquidity
26th
Leverage
24th
Tax Efficiency
82nd
Asset Efficiency
45th
Section 6

Balance Sheet

Current Ratio
2.50
median 2.84
Quick Ratio
1.96
median 2.26
Debt / EBITDA
1161530.00
median 6.75
Debt / Equity
1.07
median 0.89
Days Sales Outstanding
50.84
median 42.61
Asset Turnover
1.84
median 1.85
Section 7

Tax Overview

Federal tax
$0
State tax
$0
Effective rate
0.0%
Section 179
$100,212
Owner compensation
$328,620
Owner distributions
$0
Retirement
$58,784
Capital expenditures
$204,367
Section 8

Industry Trends

YearRevenueGrowthGrossEBITDAPayroll %
2022$3.14M+12.7%44.7%-3.8%30.9%
2023$3.53M+12.5%44.4%-3.9%30.8%
2024$4.04M+14.4%45.2%-3.6%31.2%
2025$4.32M+6.8%46.9%-2.9%32.3%
2026$5.12M+18.5%47.0%-2.9%32.4%
Section 9

Opportunities for Discussion

  • Operating Expense Load. Operating expenses run 49.9% of revenue versus a peer median of 43.8%. Which expense categories account for the difference?Benchmark variance $311K
  • Payroll Efficiency. Total labor cost represents 32.4% of revenue against a peer median of 26.8%. Is the staffing model carrying capacity for growth, or absorbing margin?Benchmark variance $286K
  • Working Capital Position. Current ratio of 2.50 compares with an industry median of 2.84. How much liquidity headroom does the business need through its cycle?Benchmark variance $179K
  • Leverage Profile. Debt to EBITDA of 1161530.00x compares with a peer median of 6.75x. Does the capital structure match the asset base and cash cycle?
  • Revenue per Employee. Revenue per employee of $233K compares with a peer median of $236K. Is productivity constrained by capacity, mix, or pricing?Benchmark variance $68K
  • Gross Margin Variance. Gross margin of 47.0% compares with a peer median of 46.6%. Where are direct costs and pricing diverging from comparable businesses?
  • Owner Compensation Structure. Owner compensation represents 6.4% of revenue compared with a 5.3% median for comparable entities. Should compensation strategy be reviewed with the tax team?
Section 10

Advisor Notes

Section 11

Methodology

Sorren Benchmark aggregates anonymized financial, tax, payroll and operational data across 60,000 businesses. Peer statistics report count, mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles and standard deviation. Comparisons use normalized ratios rather than raw dollars. Statistics are released only where a cohort contains at least 10 businesses, and individual peer companies are never displayed. Benchmark variance expresses the mathematical difference between this company and its peer median; it is not a projection of savings, nor tax or investment advice.